Hey guys, in the wiki entry it says that in the episode "Free Fall", where Joan Jett plays an immortal out to kill Duncan, it is written that Duncan calls his finishing move "empasse di soto". I misheard it that way as well. But I believe what he actually said was "passata sotto" (passed below) or "passata di sotto" (passed under). Observe:

https://benersonlittle.blog/2017/07/24/the-night-thrust-or-more-politely-the-passata-soto/

If Jacob Kell is Connor's clansman, then he's also from the clan of MacLeod. Why then is his name Kell and not MacLeod?

What are the major contradictions which need to be explained if wanting to view things like the films, the TV, Animated Series or Search for Vengeance as a single timeline? I'd like to know if we can think up ways to explain it where it would all work out.

The only thing I've come across is the idea that Connor is the ONLY immortal in films 1-3 whereas in "The Source" and "Animated Series" there are clearly still others.

Couldn't this simply be a mistake because he didn't know about any others?

On Coltec's page, it lists him as being from present day Mississippi, as part of the Cahokia tribe.  The episode he appears in originally (Something Wicked) states he's from Cahokia, not that he's just part of the tribe.  This would apply he's from the native American city of Cahokia, which was located in current Illinois, just northeast of St. Louis.

Is there a reason why the Wiki lists him as being from elsewhere?

Recently there has been a question about what should be included in the list of rules Immortals adhere to. It has long been accepted that the list consisted of both hard and fast rules such as no fighting on holy ground, and slightly (and only slightly) more flexible guidelines about not making your fights public. There is a little leeway on that one, since Immortals do sometimes let mortals into their lives.

The rules are:

No Immortal can fight on Holy Ground, no matter who regards it as Holy Immortal

Combat is one on one — no outside interference, no two on one

Mortals must not learn about Immortals — if you're killed, you move on/don't make a spectacle of yourself

No Immortal can have natural children

In the end, there can be only one — the last one will receive all the power of all the Immortals who ever lived

The rule in contention is to keep one's fights secret, which is the logical offshoot of not letting mortals learn of the existence of Immortals. The contributor who claims this does not apply, seems only to base his view on the original movie and nothing else. In the original movie, there is no backstory, no other immortals to worry about, if the Kurgan gets spotted, well, he's pretty sure he will be ruling the world pretty soon, so he doesn't much care. In the series, however, it's pointed out on several occasions that letting mortals in on the Immortal secret would be a bad thing. The episodes, Finale and Black Tower spring to mind. The implication has always been that Immortals keep it to themselves, and that means fights will not be staged as a cage match for all to see.

If you have something you'd like to add, please do. Would like to see a general consensus on what the rules should be before a final ruling as to the list included in the article.

We see some really awesome abilities and powers displayed by Jacob Kell in the trailers for Highlander Endgame but those scenes were cut out of the movie.So does that mean they arent canon to his character or are they still attributed to him in the watcher chronnicles?